<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TressCox Lawyers Blog - Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Canberra - Australian Legal Firm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:32:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Expect greater scrunity from ASX and ASIC on prospectus content and continuous disclosure</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/expect-greater-scrunity-from-asx-and-asic-on-prospectus-content-and-continuous-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/expect-greater-scrunity-from-asx-and-asic-on-prospectus-content-and-continuous-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rainbow Cheung</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuous disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-vetting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prospectus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RG 228]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listed companies and companies intending to list on the ASX can expect more scrutiny from the ASX in relation to compliance with listing rules and more detailed guidance / procedural requirements in relation to timing and pre-vetting of prospectuses.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/expect-greater-scrunity-from-asx-and-asic-on-prospectus-content-and-continuous-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Third Parties (Part 3)</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a continuation of my occasional series of blogs on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the Insurance Contracts Act. It is the third in the series on the Bill&#8216;s impact on those provisions concerning third party beneficiaries. Section 48(A) of the Act looks at contracts of life insurance effected on the life of one person<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-3/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Third Parties (Part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog continues my occasional series of blogs on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the Insurance Contracts Act. It is the second blog in the special series which looks at proposed amendments to those provisions in the Act which concern the position of third parties. This particular blog looks at proposed changes<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-2/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Third Parties (Part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog continues my series of blogs on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the Insurance Contracts Act. It is the first in a special series of blogs which looks at proposed amendments to the entitlements of third party beneficiaries &#8211; those who get a benefit under a contract of insurance but are<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-1/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-third-parties-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Cancellation of Contracts of Life Insurance</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-cancellation-of-contracts-of-life-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-cancellation-of-contracts-of-life-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 06:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog continues my series of occasional blogs on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the provisions  of the Insurance Contracts Act. Today&#8217;s blog looks at the proposed amendments to Section 59 of the Act. Section 59 outlines the procedure which an insurer must follow to cancel a contract of insurance. In broad<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-cancellation-of-contracts-of-life-insurance/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-cancellation-of-contracts-of-life-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newsflash &#8211; Insurance Contracts Act</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/newsflash-insurance-contracts-act/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/newsflash-insurance-contracts-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 02:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two extremely important developments that I would like to bring to your attention. The first is that last Monday the Western Australia Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in Maxwell v Highway Hauliers. You may recall that this case concerned two points:- did Section 54 of the Insurance Contracts Act apply where the<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/newsflash-insurance-contracts-act/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/newsflash-insurance-contracts-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Life Insurance and Age Misrepresentation</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurance-and-age-misrepresentation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurance-and-age-misrepresentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 03:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog continues my occasional series on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the Insurance Contracts Act. Section 30 of the Act concerns the remedies available to a life insurer where a life insured misrepresents his or her age.  (Just to pause for a moment &#8211; it is important to remember that<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurance-and-age-misrepresentation/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurance-and-age-misrepresentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Life Insurer&#8217;s Remedies for Innocent Non Disclosure and Misrepresentation</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurers-remedies-for-innocent-non-disclosure-and-misrepresentation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurers-remedies-for-innocent-non-disclosure-and-misrepresentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 07:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the tenth blog in my occasional series of blogs on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the Insurance Contracts Act. Section 29 of the Act sets out the remedies available to a life insurer where there has been a non-disclosure or misrepresentation except where the life insurer would have entered<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurers-remedies-for-innocent-non-disclosure-and-misrepresentation/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-life-insurers-remedies-for-innocent-non-disclosure-and-misrepresentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lesser Known Insurance Contracts Act &#8211; Section 27</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-lesser-known-insurance-contracts-act-section-27/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-lesser-known-insurance-contracts-act-section-27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 04:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog continues my series on some of the lesser known provisions of the Insurance Contracts Act. Section 27 concerns a failure to answer a question in a proposal form properly. Failure may mean an obviously incomplete answer or no answer at all. In those circumstances Section 27 provides the incomplete answer or absence of any answer is not<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-lesser-known-insurance-contracts-act-section-27/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/05/the-lesser-known-insurance-contracts-act-section-27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 &#8211; Unbundling Life Insurance Contracts</title>
		<link>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/04/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-unbundling-life-insurance-contracts/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/04/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-unbundling-life-insurance-contracts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 03:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sheller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tresscox.com.au/?p=1711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is ninth blog in my occasional series on the impact of the Insurance Contracts Amendment Bill 2013 on the Insurance Contracts Act. In this blog I return to the notion of the unbundling of contracts of insurance which I discussed in an earlier blog in this series. But this time I am looking at contracts of<a href="http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/04/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-unbundling-life-insurance-contracts/"> Click to read more...</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.tresscox.com.au/2013/04/the-insurance-contracts-amendment-bill-2013-unbundling-life-insurance-contracts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
